When Patriot Mobile PAC trustees took over GCISD a year ago, they promptly started misleading the community.
WHAT’S TRUE? Click to watch the video for yourself in under 2 minutes! Or read on…
In the video:
NOT SO FAST: A Trustee who was endorsed by Patriot Mobile in 2022 states that the district training would provide “lots and lots of clarity for our teachers” on the new policy.
WE KNOW BETTER: The Patriot Mobile Trustee said she was “glad to hear [Advanced Placement (AP) classes] aren’t threatened in any way.”
Nope! GCISD cut the Director of Advanced Academics and AP Coordinator positions. They cut AP Mandarin, AP Latin, AP European History; high-level math students are teaching themselves; CHHS GT classes were eliminated or had 1 offering only; AP teachers are quitting & retiring; and 18 books are still banned from advanced secondary courses. All these changes are huge threats to the quality of GCISD‘s reputation. [ Watch: College Impact Panel ]
SAY WHAT NOW?: Next, in the same public meeting, Trustee Becky St. John asks for clarification on the instructional policy, wondering if a teacher could speak about breaking news during a US History, World History, or Government class?
At 25 seconds into the video, the response from district staff is NO. “That may be the course, but it may not be where they are in their Scope and Sequence.” The new policy is drastically limiting teachers to whatever is scripted in the boxed lesson plan for that day. It seems like a social studies teacher would be risking their job if they mentioned the day’s headlines.
GCISD deserves better than what Patriot Mobile PAC is offering!
Vouchers in the 2023 Texas Legislature: A Timeline
Newest headlines at the top
Monday, May 15: Texas Committee on Public Education invites speakers for new voucher bill SB 8:
Video: Vouchers/Educations Spending Accounts redistribute taxpayer dollars from public schools; yet private schools are not required to provide federal protections for special education students or accept all students:
Friday, April 7: Texas House comes out against school vouchers in initial vote. GCISD’s Texas Representative Giovanni Capriglione voted in favor of vouchers. The Representative for the Euless area of GCISD, Salman Bhojani, voted against school vouchers.Source: The Texas Standard
Tuesday, March 29th: Bill that would give parents state funds to pay for private schools moves to the full Senate for a vote. AUSTIN, Texas â (The Texas Tribune) A sweeping public education bill that would allow families to use taxpayer money to send their children to private schools and restrict classroom lessons on sexual orientation received initial approval Tuesday and will now go before the Senate for a full vote. … The bill would give parents who opt out of the public school system access to a savings account with up to $8,000 in taxpayer money, per student, which could be used to pay for a childâs private schooling and other educational expenses, such as textbooks or tutoring.” Source WFAA-TV
Vouchers in GCISD? A Deep Dive Summary:
Are vouchers for private schools a better alternative to “government schools” aka public schools? The answer is no.
Some in our community are friendly to vouchers or charter schools, including a former mayor now-school board candidate.
Breaking with PTA for the first time in history, the GCISD New School Board Majority removed the annual “no vouchers, no charter schools” statement from its legislative priorities this year.
What is the thread connecting the former Mayor of Colleyville with the GCISD school board decision to break from a long-standing PTA supported initiative with the Texas legislature‘s move to provide $8K for private schools?
The answer: School Vouchers to fund private charter schools.
And why should GCISD citizens care about these connections?
Families who value their public school education and the community at large should question why a charter school supporter like Newton is now running to be a trustee of a public school.
Jump to a Part of this Deep Dive, or keep scrolling to read it all.
Part I. As mayor, Richard Newton endorsed a charter school company called ResponsiveEd “that would like to get a school started in Colleyville.”
The scene is Spring 2021 at a Colleyville City Council Meeting. Mayor Richard Newton, who is a current candidate for GCISD School Board, spoke from the dais about his meeting with ResponsiveEd, a company that runs charter schools in Texas in collaboration with Hillsdale College. Newton says he is a “strong supporter” of Hillsdale College, especially its curriculum of Christian education and the Constitution.
In the video, Newton says the company’s representative has talked to a few pastors in town because the company would like to get a school started in Colleyville.
Watch the video and read the email between Newton and the rep, Kalese Whitehurst:
What is Classical Education? Do you notice that the document titled ResponsiveEd (above), there is no mention of “Christian education,” which is what then-Mayor Richard Newton stated that he liked about Hillsdale/ResponsiveEd bringing to Colleyville. Why does the document not state that a ResponsiveEd school is Christian â is this what “Classical education” means? Yes, according to a cover story by Christianity Today that provides insight into Classical Education and states “evangelicals are becoming the new champions of the pagan classics.” Read more documentation about the Classical education movement on Wikipedia. Several community speakers at the GCISD Board of Trustees’ open forum have begun promoting a return to Classical education. Why?
Part II. Texas Monthly exposes ResponsiveEd for voucher scheme that would divert public school funds to private companies
“Political operatives descended on the Hill Country town of Wimberley with a scheme to send taxpayer dollars to private schools. Now theyâre shopping the same blueprint elsewhere. …”
“One of the authors of the plan was Aaron Harris, a Fort Worthâbased GOP consultant … along with Monty Bennett, a wealthy Dallas hotelier who dabbles in what he regards as education reform. …”
“The other author was Kalese Whitehurst, an executive with the charter school chain Responsive Education Solutions, based in Lewisville, a half hour north of Dallas. …”
“The scheme was complex but it pursued a simple goal: turning taxpayer dollars intended for public education into funds for private schools. The kids would be counted as Wimberley ISD students enrolled at the Achievement Campus, thus drawing significant money to the district. (In Texas, public schools receive funding based in large part on how many students attend school each day.) But the tax dollars their âattendanceâ brought to the district would be redirected to private institutions across the state. …”
“The most transformative of a set of policies often described by proponents as âschool choice,â vouchers allow students to attend private schools using taxpayer dollars. For more than sixty years, school-choice enthusiasts have tried, and failed, to create a voucher program in Texas. Texasâs first dalliance with vouchers came in the wake of the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ordered desegregation of public schools.“
The Texas Monthly article concludes: “When I spoke to [Joe Basel, the self-styled âsystemic disruptionâ consultant], he conceded that his reputation didnât help his cause. But he hasnât given up on passing the voucher program. âItâs still my goal,â he told me. âOther districts are considering it.â He declined to name which ones.â
Part III. For the first time in history, the GCISD New School Board Majority voted 4-3 to remove the annual âno vouchers, no charter schoolsâ statement from its 2023 legislative priorities â signaling support for the state to take even more funding away from GCISD and abandoning their oath to GCISD families.
A voucher system gives money to private and religious schools without requiring them to follow the same accountability standards and open admission policy as public schools.
The Texas Legislature convenes every other year. The School Board creates a list of legislative priorities to communicate the districtâs needs and goals to Texas Senators and Representatives as they write and pass laws. Independently, the PTA will create its own legislative priorities.
Two Years Ago February 2021
In 2021, the GCISD Board of Trustees opposed vouchers and charter school expansion in their legislative priorities.
Feb. 27, 2023 – The board reviewed a request from the PTA to support PTA’s legislative priorities.
The New School Board Majority â Casey Ford, Tammy Nakamura, Kathy Florence-Spradley, and Shannon Braun â voted to table the PTA’s request to support them.Â
Board President Ford said, “It’s still unclear who has been behind the scenes working on this request.”
GCISD Trustee Becky St. John in her dissenting vote reminded the board that knowingly allowing the state to take away funds from our district in this way violates their code of ethics to work against GCISD and supports diverting public funds.
Sometimes, seeing events on a timeline helps us understand the bigger picture. What do you see? What questions do you have so far?
Why are the extremists pretending they don’t know our Council of PTAs?
Why is our Public School Board of Trustees refusing to collaborate with PTA on a pro-public school stance?
Historically, only communities with low-performing public schools get charter school approval. Is this why they are cutting funding and creating chaos?
Would someone trying to bring a charter school to Colleyville be someone we should elect to serve on our public school board of trustees?
Who is eyeing our community for voucher/charter schools â and whose pockets will benefit from the payout potential?
Part IV. GCISD citizens should ask, as communities all over the country are asking: Can a private school serve students better than a publicly funded school?
We need to be aware that the same organization and people who wanted to take over Wimberly ISD “would like to get a school started in Colleyville,” said then-Mayor Richard Newton.
Will private schools be accountable to taxpayers? Currently the State does not require private/charters to administer the STAAR student performance test, to provide financial reporting or accountability, or to comply with Special Education rules.
Private schools may exclude students because of a diagnosis that the private school is not equipped to serve, such as dyslexia or diabetes.
Did you know: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that protects individuals with disabilities from discrimination. However, the ADA contains an exemption for religious institutions, including religious schools. Therefore, the ADA does not apply to religious schools or offer students attending these schools protection from discrimination.” Source: American Diabetes Association
What if a family is suddenly unable to afford tuition, if a parent dies or loses a lucrative job? How soon would the student need to transfer to the free, under-funded public school? Private schools also rely heavily on private donations from families instead of fully rolling the cost of service into tuition, likely eliminating families who can only afford to attend due to the government subsidized education voucher.
Private schools may reject students who do not adhere to the religious code of the school. It’s already happened in a Colleyville private school. In 2020, a longtime student was expelled from the private religious school after coming out as gay.
In summary
A takeover of our public school system by private schools will create an underclass of under-educated people in a single generation.
Vouchers donât add up for Texas children. It is a sneaky move to privatize education, will immediately harm our local schools, and in the end, dismantle the right to a public education in America.
Donât give up on public schools. Everyone belongs in a public school. We are GCISD!
March 30 update: What to watch for: The current bill states that current private school students are not eligible, so what is the harm? As in many policy roll-outs, a bill is reduced to what is most likely to be accepted and seems innocuous, but then once the ball gets rolling, it is more easily updated in future sessions. And before you know it, voila, a completely privatized system of education, no longer public schools for public good.